Find out how with one workout set you can start muscle growth and dramatically change your muscles. Almost all the time since the publication of Mike's training principles, they caused not only rejection in many people, but often statements about them were offensive. Some people, apparently jealous of the success of Mentzer's system, have called his theory a conventional advertising ploy. Let's see if Mike Mentzer's theory is a bodybuilding publicity stunt.
Does Mentzer's theory work?
Those claims that Mike Mentzer's theory is a publicity stunt in bodybuilding can be very quickly dispelled, since Mentzer himself began using them even before he created his own training system. The first talk about Mike's training methodology began in 1976 with publications in Muscle Builder magazine.
Mike's interview with Gene Mosey was then printed. It was in it that Mentzer's training principles were first discussed, and it must be admitted that Mozie was very skeptical from the outset. He asked directly if this system was intended for the lazy, as Mike used five sets for each group, training the whole body. At the same time, classes were held three times throughout the week.
Then in bodybuilding it was the norm to do two dozen approaches per group, training almost every day. Mike responded by saying that one approach is enough for him for high-quality pumping.
In addition, Mentzer talked about the methods of increasing the intensity of training used by him, about the importance of training to failure, etc. It wasn't Heavy Duty at the time. For the first time, Mike spoke about her only in 1977, during his first seminars.
Quite quickly, this training methodology became popular, as can be seen in the sales of his book and courses. This is probably due to the result that the athletes were able to obtain by training according to the Mentzer system. This was not an unfounded theory, because it was confirmed by the results of scientific research. As you can see, Mike started talking about his system long before he started selling Heavy Duty. When creating his system, Mentzer used the accumulated knowledge and research results, after which he tested them in practice. This is what predetermined the success of Mentzer's theory. For more than three decades, the system has been successful, which indicates its performance.
How to burn fat according to Mike Mentzer?
For every athlete, it is important not only to gain weight, but also to get rid of accumulated fat. If the athletes who train for themselves have a lot of time for this, then it is important for the performing athletes to be on time and this can be very difficult to do. To calculate the time it will take you in preparation for the tournament to bring yourself into a head start. It should be remembered that the calorie content of a gram of fat is 9 kilocalories.
For athletes weighing 90 kilos, the daily calorie intake should be about 3200 calories. To burn fat, you need to reduce the energy value of your diet, but not abruptly. Only the heart can directly use fat for energy. Other muscles require glucose or amines. The body never receives energy from only one source. According to Mike, first of all, you need to decide on the start date of the tournament and calculate how long it will take to get in shape, given that you cannot lose more than half a kilogram of mass during the week. Otherwise, you will burn not only body fat, but also muscle.
Static Mentzer Theory Exercises
Mike studied the static weight retention system closely. If you are familiar with his work, then you know that he was a fan of Arthur Jones' research. Only a few years after their practical use, Mentzer began to criticize some of the postulates of Jones' theory.
Previously, he was confident in the effectiveness of performing movements with full amplitude and this is what Arthur spoke about and this was one of the main postulates of his theory of high-intensity training. Mike encouraged his students to use static holdings in their training programs, explaining that it was more stress on the muscles compared to the positive phase of the movement.
Mentzer was confident that static holdings would be most effective when performing isolated movements. It is for this reason that his students very often used the Nautilus simulators. Holds should be performed at the end of the standard approach or replaced by them altogether. Dorian Yates used this technique very often during his training and was satisfied with the results.
Lee Priest talks about Mentzer's theory in the following video:
